Regular Post
Written by revera-admin

Why Do Nipples Sometimes “Shift” After Breast Reduction Surgery?

The Mystery of the Moving Nipple

One of the most frustrating issues after a successful breast reduction is seeing the nipple position change months after the surgery. A patient may leave the operating room with perfect symmetry, only to find that 3 to 6 months later, the nipples appear to be “riding high” on the breast mound.

Surgeons Dr. Melvyn Dinner and Dr. Lawrence Chait studied this phenomenon in 50 patients who underwent the McKissock vertical dermal pedicle technique. While the technique was excellent for nipple health and sensation, they discovered a consistently recurring problem: the “high-riding nipple”.

The Cause: Gravity and the “Skin Brassiere”

The study revealed that the nipple doesn’t actually move up; rather, the breast tissue moves down.

  • The Slump: Over the first few months, the breast tissue settles and “slumps” due to gravity.
  • The Stretch: The “skin brassiere” (the skin holding the breast) naturally stretches under the weight of the remaining breast tissue.
  • The Scar: In some cases, the vertical scar itself can stretch significantly—sometimes by as much as 2 cm.

As the bottom of the breast drops and the skin stretches, the nipple—which is anchored higher up—appears to “ride” too high in relation to the new breast mound.

Proven Success: Safety is Still High

Despite this aesthetic challenge, the McKissock technique proved to be incredibly safe in this series of 100 breasts:

  • 100% Nipple Viability: There was no nipple loss or even minor skin peeling.
  • Full Sensation: Every patient maintained nipple sensation to light touch.
  • High Satisfaction: Patients were generally satisfied with the shape and the resulting scars.

How Surgeons Prevent the “High Ride” Today

To avoid this long-term shift, modern surgeons have refined how they plan the surgery:

  1. Lower Initial Placement: Some surgeons intentionally place the nipple-areola complex slightly lower than the “ideal” spot during surgery, anticipating that the breast will settle into a perfect position later.
  2. Internal Support: Using techniques like the “Internal Bra” or specialized suturing helps anchor the breast tissue so it doesn’t slump as much.
  3. Accurate Marking: Preoperative markings are done with the patient standing up to account for the natural pull of gravity on the tissue.

Conclusion

If your nipples look slightly “low” immediately after a reduction, don’t worry—your surgeon may have planned it that way. Understanding that the “skin brassiere” will stretch over the first six months allows surgeons to compensate for gravity and ensure your nipples stay in the perfect spot for years to come.

———————–

Ask yourself “Who is the Best Plastic Surgeon Near Me?”.

Revera Clinic caters with the Best Plastic Surgeon in Hyderabad!

Breast Reduction Surgery Cost varies between individuals!

Contact us to know if you are a suitable candidate for Breast Reduction Surgery!

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Q: Is a high-riding nipple dangerous?

A: No, it is purely an aesthetic concern. It does not affect the health of the breast or the success of the surgery in terms of pain relief.

Q: How long does it take for the breast to “settle” into its final shape?

A: Most of the stretching and slumping occurs between 3 to 6 months after the procedure.

Q: Can a high-riding nipple be fixed?

A: Yes. If the nipple position is significantly off after the breast has fully settled, a minor revision can often be performed to adjust the placement.

Reference

Breast Reduction
, , , , , , , , , , , , ,
0
Regular Post
Written by revera-admin

The Nipple Safety Test: How Surgeons Use “Fluorescence” to Prevent Complications in Breast Reduction Surgery

The Surgical Anxiety: The “Dusky” Nipple

At the very end of a breast reduction procedure, one of the most stressful moments for a plastic surgeon is seeing a “dusky” or blue-looking nipple-areola complex. This discoloration can indicate poor blood flow, which may lead to a “slough” or the death of the tissue.

Historically, the response was to apply dressings and hope for the best the following morning. However, researchers in La Jolla, California, pioneered a more scientific approach: the Intravenous Fluorescein Test.

What is the Fluorescein Test?

Fluorescein is a special dye (resorcinolphthalein) that has been used in medicine since 1881. When injected into the bloodstream, it travels through the vessels and into the skin.

How the Test Works During Surgery

  1. The Injection: Before the final stitches are placed, the surgeon injects a specific dose of fluorescein intravenously.
  2. The UV Light: Fifteen minutes later, the room is darkened, and the breast is examined under an ultraviolet (UV) light.
  3. The Glow: Healthy, viable skin will glow a bright chartreuse (yellow-green) color under the light.
  4. The Warning: Any areas that remain dark blue or do not glow are at high risk for tissue loss.

The Study: Saving the Nipple in Real-Time

In a series of 35 patients undergoing McKissock-type reductions, surgeons used this test to predict and avoid disasters.

  • The Reassurance: In 31 patients, the tissue glowed perfectly, confirming that everything was healthy.
  • The “False Alarm”: In one patient, the nipple looked blue to the eye, but the fluorescein test showed it was glowing. The surgeon left it alone, and the tissue survived perfectly.
  • The Life-Saving Intervention: In another patient, the test revealed no glow. The surgeon opened the incision and found that the internal tissue “pedicle” was kinked and folded too tightly. After correcting the position, the nipple glowed, and the tissue was saved.

Why This Matters for Your Safety

While this specific test was pioneered in the early 1980s, the principle remains a cornerstone of modern plastic surgery: Objective Safety Monitoring.

Today, surgeons may use similar fluorescence technology (like ICG-Angiography) to check blood flow during complex reconstructions. This “safety check” allows your surgeon to:

  • Predict tissue survival with high accuracy.
  • Correct internal issues (like kinked blood vessels) while you are still in the operating room.
  • Avoid the “disaster” of nipple tissue loss.

Conclusion

Your safety during a breast reduction isn’t left to “prayer and hope”. Advanced techniques like fluorescein testing give surgeons a “window” into your blood circulation, ensuring that your results are not only beautiful but also medically sound.

———————–

Ask yourself “Who is the Best Plastic Surgeon Near Me?”.

Revera Clinic caters with the Best Plastic Surgeon in Hyderabad!

Breast Reduction Surgery Cost varies between individuals!

Contact us to know if you are a suitable candidate for Breast Reduction Surgery!

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Q: Is the fluorescein dye safe?

A: Yes, it has been used safely in ophthalmology and surgery for over a century. The body typically clears the dye within 24 hours.

Q: Does every surgeon use a UV light test?

A: Not every surgeon uses this specific test for every patient. However, most will use clinical signs (like “capillary refill”) or modern infrared imaging if they have any concerns about blood flow during your procedure.

Q: Can a “dusky” nipple still survive?

A: Yes. As the study showed, sometimes a nipple looks dusky due to temporary bruising or vein congestion, but is actually healthy. The fluorescein test helps the surgeon tell the difference.

References

Breast Reduction
, , , , , , , , , , , , ,
0
Regular Post
Written by revera-admin

Small Scars, Large Results: The Integrated “Vertical” Technique for Breast Reduction Surgery

The Best of Both Worlds

When considering breast reduction, many patients are caught between two desires. They want a significant reduction in size, but they also want to avoid the long horizontal scar of a traditional “Anchor” reduction.

The Lejour Vertical Technique is famous for reducing scars, but some believe it is only for small procedures. However, surgeons in Charleston have developed a way to integrate the Central Mound technique with vertical skin removal to handle larger cases safely.

How the Integrated Technique Works

This approach is unique because it combines internal tissue shaping with external skin management.

  • Vertical Skin Resection: This limits the scar to a “lollipop” shape, significantly decreasing visible scarring.
  • Central Mound Reduction: By removing tissue from the central and superior (upper) part of the breast, surgeons can remove 400 to 1000 grams per side while preserving the blood supply and feeling in the nipple.
  • Internal Support: Unlike other methods, the tissue at the bottom (inferior pedicle) is folded on itself. This acts like an internal bra, providing better support and projection.

The Role of Liposuction

A major part of this technique is the use of extensive liposuction in the lateral breast and underarm (axilla) areas.

  • Efficiency: Up to two-thirds of the breast tissue can sometimes be removed using liposuction alone if the breast is composed mostly of fat.
  • Safety First: Surgeons carefully avoid liposuction in the center of the breast to protect the blood supply to the nipple.

Is This Technique Right for You?

This integrated approach is ideal for candidates who need a moderate to large reduction (up to 1000g per side) but prioritize a smaller scar.

Important Considerations:

  1. Nipple Placement: If your nipple needs to be moved more than 8 cm vertically, a different procedure may be safer.
  2. Patience is Key: It can take up to 6 months for the final shape of the breast to settle and develop.
  3. Smoking Status: Smoking significantly reduces the safety of this procedure and the distance a nipple can be moved.

Conclusion

By integrating the central mound with the vertical scar technique, surgeons can offer “superior shaped” results through much smaller incisions. It is a powerful option for achieving significant relief from heavy breasts without the traditional “Anchor” scar.

———————–

Ask yourself “Who is the Best Plastic Surgeon Near Me?”.
Contact us to know if you are a suitable candidate for Breast Reduction.

Revera Clinic caters with the Best Plastic Surgeon in Hyderabad!

Contact us to know if you are a suitable candidate for Vertical Small Scar Breast Reduction Surgery!

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Q: Will I lose sensation in my nipples?

A: This specific combination of techniques is designed to preserve the innervation (nerve supply) to the nipple-areola complex even during large reductions.

Q: What is “tumescent fluid”?

A: It is a solution injected into the breast before surgery that helps with liposuction and reduces bleeding.

Q: Do I need a mammogram first?

A: According to the study’s protocol, mammograms are routinely obtained for patients over 35 or those with a family history of breast cancer.

Reference

Breast Reduction
, , , , , , , , , , , ,
0
Regular Post
Written by revera-admin

Preventing the “Sag”: How to Keep Your Breast Shape After Breast Reduction Surgery

The Problem: The “Bottoming Out” Effect

Many patients are thrilled with their breast reduction results immediately after surgery. However, a common long-term concern is “pseudoptosis,” better known as bottoming out.

This happens when the breast tissue sinks toward the bottom of the breast over time. It can leave the nipple looking too high and the lower part of the breast looking overly heavy or stretched.

Is this inevitable? According to a study published in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, the answer depends on the surgical technique used – Which could help Preventing Sagging After Breast Reduction Surgery!

The Solution: The Medial Pedicle Technique

Researchers in New York analyzed 88 consecutive patients who underwent a specific type of surgery: the Medial Pedicle with a Wise Pattern resection.

  • Medial Pedicle: This refers to the “bridge” of tissue that keeps the blood supply to the nipple coming from the middle of the chest.
  • Wise Pattern: This is the traditional “Anchor” shaped incision pattern.

By combining these two, surgeons found they could create a more stable internal structure that resists gravity better than older methods.

The Results: Stability Over Time

The study followed patients for a minimum of one year to see how their shape changed. They measured the distance from the nipple to the crease under the breast (inframammary fold).

The Findings:

  • Minimal Stretching: For moderate reductions (500g to 1200g per side), the distance increased by only 11% after a year.
  • Handling Massive Weight: Even in very large reductions (>1200g per side), the technique remained effective at preventing significant sagging.
  • Efficiency: The average operative time was fast—just 104.5 minutes.
  • Safety: The complication rate was low at 6.8%.

Conclusion: A Reliable Way to Lasting Results

If you are considering a breast reduction, you want a result that looks as good in five years as it does in five months.

The authors concluded that the medial pedicle approach is an effective and reliable way to treat a wide range of breast sizes. It offers a short operative time, a low risk of complications, and—most importantly—less “bottoming out” over the long term.

——————————-

Ask yourself “Who is the Best Plastic Surgeon Near Me?”.
Contact us to know if you are a suitable candidate for Breast Reduction.

Revera Clinic caters with the Best Plastic Surgeon in Hyderabad!

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Q: What exactly is “pseudoptosis”?

A: It is the medical term for the appearance of sagging where the breast tissue falls below the crease, but the nipple remains relatively in place.

Q: Is this technique suitable for very large breasts?

A: Yes. The study included patients with severe hypertrophy and found the medial pedicle to be highly reliable even for massive reductions.

Q: Does a shorter surgery time mean it’s less safe?

A: Not at all. In this study, the short operative time was combined with a very low complication rate of only 6.8%.

Reference

Based on the research from Manhattan Eye Ear and Throat Hospital, here is a checklist of high-value questions you can ask during your consultation to see if the medial pedicle technique is the right approach for your surgery.

Consultation Checklist: Discussing Technique and Longevity

  • “What ‘pedicle’ do you typically use for my size of reduction?”
    • Why ask: While many surgeons use an inferior pedicle, the medial pedicle has been shown to be exceptionally reliable for both severe hypertrophy and aesthetic shaping.
  • “How do you address the risk of ‘bottoming out’ or pseudoptosis over time?”
    • Why ask: Research indicates that the medial pedicle technique results in significantly less long-term sagging—an average increase of only 11% in the lower breast length for standard reductions.
  • “Is the medial pedicle safe for the amount of tissue I need removed?”
    • Why ask: This technique is proven to be effective and safe even for massive reductions (over 1200g per side).
  • “What is your typical operative time for this procedure?”
    • Why ask: The medial pedicle with a Wise pattern is known for being an efficient procedure, averaging around 104 minutes, which can mean less time under anesthesia.
  • “Can I see ‘long-term’ before and after photos (at least 1 year post-op)?”
    • Why ask: Since “bottoming out” occurs over time, looking at results from patients followed for a year or more is the best way to judge the stability of the surgeon’s technique.

Breast Reduction
, , , , , , , , , , , ,
0
Pain Pump in Breast Reduction Surgery. Shows the schematic with the Infusion Chamber
Regular Post
Written by revera-admin

Less Pain, Faster Home: The Power of “Pain Pumps” in Breast Reduction Surgery

The End of the Hospital “Hangover”

Traditionally, recovering from a breast reduction or reconstruction required a hospital stay. Patients often needed heavy intravenous (IV) narcotics to manage their pain. These medications effectively block pain, but they often cause nausea, grogginess, and constipation.

Researchers at Northwestern Memorial Hospital in Chicago found a better way. By using a continuous “pain pump,” they helped patients go home sooner with significantly less discomfort.

What is a “Pain Pump”?

A pain pump is a small, portable device. It uses a tiny, indwelling catheter to deliver local anesthetic directly to the surgical site. Unlike a one-time injection, the pump provides a continuous infiltration of numbing medication for several days.

The Study: 148 Patients Compared

The study analyzed 74 breast reduction patients and 74 breast reconstruction patients. The researchers compared those who used traditional pain relief to those who used the Pain Pump in Breast Reduction Surgery.

1. Benefits for Pain Pump in Breast Reduction Surgery

The results for breast reduction patients were dramatic.

  • Fewer Hospital Stays: Patients with the pump were significantly less likely to need hospital admission. Many were able to recover comfortably at home.
  • Lower Pain Scores: Patients reported significantly less pain while in the recovery room.
  • Fewer Narcotics: The pump group required much lower amounts of cumulative pain medication.

2. Benefits for Breast Reconstruction

For those undergoing tissue expander reconstruction, the pump also offered clear advantages.

  • Significant Pain Relief: These patients reported much lower average pain scores.
  • Reduced Medication Use: Like the reduction group, these patients used significantly fewer narcotics.
  • Proven Safety: There were zero expander infections related to having the catheter near the implant.

Why This Fits Modern Guidelines

The American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS) now strongly recommends these types of “non-narcotic” strategies. Using local anesthetics like Bupivacaine significantly improves pain scores immediately after surgery. It also helps you get through recovery with fewer side effects.

Medication Overview: What’s in the Pump?

To help you understand your recovery, here is a brief overview of the medications involved in this study.

1. Bupivacaine (Local Anesthetic)

  • Category: Local anesthetic (Amide-type).
  • Mechanism of Action: It blocks sodium channels in the nerve fibers. This stops the nerve from sending pain signals to your brain.
  • Potential Side Effects: While very safe in a pump, potential side effects can include localized numbness or tingling. In very rare cases of accidental systemic absorption, it can affect the heart or central nervous system.

2. Narcotics (Opioids)

  • Category: Opioid analgesics.
  • Mechanism of Action: These bind to specific “opioid receptors” in the brain and spinal cord. They change how your body perceives and responds to pain.
  • Potential Side Effects: Common side effects include nausea, vomiting, dizziness, and constipation. They also carry a risk of respiratory depression and potential dependency with long-term use.

——————————-

Ask yourself “Who is the Best Plastic Surgeon Near Me?”.
Contact us to know if you are a suitable candidate for Breast Reduction.

Revera Clinic caters with the Best Plastic Surgeon in Hyderabad!
Our Anaesthetists are highly accomplished and help in a pain free recovery.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Q: Does the pump hurt to remove?

A: No. The catheter is very thin, similar to a piece of fishing line. Removing it is usually quick and painless, often done by the patient or nurse at home.

Q: Will I still need some narcotic pills?

A: Most patients still have a prescription for “breakthrough” pain. However, as this study shows, you will likely need much fewer than if you didn’t have the pump.

Q: Is it safe for breast implants?

A: Yes. The study specifically noted that there were no infections or issues when the pump was used near tissue expanders.

References

Breast Reduction, Pain Management
, , , , , , , , ,
0
Regular Post
Written by revera-admin

The Vertical “Lollipop” Scar: Now for Large Breasts – Breast Reduction

Can Large Breasts Have Smaller Scars?

In the past, patients with very large breasts (resection weights over 700g) were almost always given an “Anchor” scar. Surgeons believed the Vertical (or “Lollipop“) technique only worked for small reductions. They feared that the vertical scar would not be strong enough to hold the weight of a larger breast over time.

However, a massive study published in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery has changed that thinking.

Researchers analyzed 500 breast reductions in 250 overweight patients. The research was conducted in Ulm, Germany, and Padova, Italy. They used a modified version of the “Lejour Technique” to prove that large breasts can achieve excellent results with fewer scars.

The Modifications: Making the Vertical Technique Stronger

The standard vertical technique can be difficult for large breasts. Therefore, the authors introduced several key modifications to make it more reliable.

1. Central Undermining (No Liposuction)

Instead of using liposuction to reduce volume, the surgeons used a “step-wise” surgical approach. They moved the tissue centrally and atraumatically. This preserves the best possible blood supply to the skin and nipple.

2. The “Three H Points” Fixation

This is the most critical part of the modification. A common problem with vertical reductions is “bottoming out.” This happens when the breast tissue sinks over time, making the bottom of the breast look too heavy.

To prevent this, the surgeons fixed the submammary fold (the crease under the breast) using three H points. These points act as a “pivot.” They anchor the internal tissue so it cannot sag later.

3. Adjusted Pleated Sutures

The vertical scar is often “pleated” or gathered during surgery. The authors adjusted this technique to match the specific retraction ability of the patient’s skin. For very large reductions, they occasionally combined it with a small horizontal line to ensure a smooth finish.

The Results: 94% Success Rate

The study tracked 250 patients for an average of 4.2 years. This long-term follow-up is important to see if the shape holds up.

  • Large Reductions: The average tissue removed was nearly 1,000g per breast (over 2 lbs).
  • Patient Outcomes: 94% of patients rated their results as “Very Good” or “Good”.
  • Safety: The complication rate was 14%, which is comparable to traditional techniques.

Conclusion: A New Standard for Large Breasts

This research proves that the vertical technique is no longer just for “small” cases. It is a highly effective standard technique for larger breasts.

By using the “Three H Points,” surgeons can simplify the technique while reducing the visible scarring. If you have been told you are “too large” for a vertical reduction, this study shows that a modified approach can offer the smaller scar you want with the stability you need.

——————————-

Ask yourself “Who is the Best Plastic Surgeon Near Me?”.
Contact us to know if you are a suitable candidate for Breast Reduction.

Revera Clinic caters with the Best Plastic Surgeon in Hyderabad!

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Q: Does this technique work if I am overweight?

A: Yes. This study specifically looked at overweight patients with an average resection weight of over 900g per breast.

Q: Will the “pleated” scar look bumpy?

A: Initially, the vertical scar may look gathered. However, the study adjusted the sutures to the skin’s natural ability to retract. Over time, these lines typically flatten and fade significantly.

Q: What is the main benefit over the “Anchor” scar?

A: The primary benefit is the reduction of aesthetic deficiencies. You avoid the long horizontal scar across the chest, resulting in a more natural look in clothing and swimwear.

Reference

Hofmann, Albert K. M.D.; et al. “Breast Reduction: Modified ‘Lejour Technique’ in 500 Large Breasts.” Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 120(5):p 1095-1104, October 2007.

Breast Reduction, Gigantomastia
, , , , , , , , , , ,
0
Regular Post
Written by revera-admin

Breast Reduction: Is It Safe if You are Morbidly Obese?

The Weight Barrier

Many plastic surgeons hesitate to perform breast reductions on patients with a high Body Mass Index (BMI). This is especially true for “morbidly obese” patients (BMI of 40 or higher).

Surgeons often worry about a higher risk of infections and poor wound healing. They also fear the challenges of Gigantomastia. This is when a surgeon must remove more than 2,000 grams of tissue from each breast.

But does the data actually support turning these patients away? A study published in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery investigated this exact question.

The Study: Analyzing 179 Patients

Researchers in Galveston, Texas, performed a retrospective review of 179 patients. They wanted to see which factors truly caused complications. They looked at:

  • Body Mass Index (BMI).
  • The weight of the tissue removed.
  • The patient’s age.
  • Smoking status.
  • Other health conditions (comorbidities).

The Findings: Safety Across the Scale

The researchers found an overall complication rate of 50%. While this number seems high, it mostly consisted of minor healing issues common in large-volume surgeries.

Crucially, the study found no statistical difference in complications based on:

  1. BMI: Patients with a BMI over 40 were just as safe as those with lower BMIs.
  2. Reduction Size: Removing massive amounts of tissue (>2000g) did not increase the danger.
  3. Age: Older patients did not face more risks than younger ones in this group.

Furthermore, smoking status and other medical conditions did not significantly impact the complication rates in this study.

The Conclusion: A Green Light for Surgery

The study reached a bold conclusion. It is as safe to perform large-volume breast reductions in morbidly obese patients as it is in anyone else.

What This Means for You

If you have a high BMI and suffer from the weight of very large breasts, you may have been told to “lose weight first.” While losing weight is generally healthy, this research proves that you do not have to wait to find relief from physical pain.

Modern guidelines from the American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS) agree. They recommend that surgery be offered based on your symptoms, not just your weight.

If you suffer from back pain, rashes, or shoulder grooving, you deserve a consultation. A skilled surgeon can perform your reduction safely, regardless of your starting weight.

—————

Ask yourself “Who is the Best Plastic Surgeon Near Me?”.
Contact us to know if you are a suitable candidate for Breast Reduction.

Revera Clinic caters with the Best Plastic Surgeon in Hyderabad!

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Q: Will a high BMI make my recovery longer?

A: Possibly. While major complications are not higher, some studies suggest that patients with a BMI over 35 may take longer than two months to heal completely.

Q: What is “Gigantomastia”?

A: This is a medical term for extremely large breasts. It usually applies when a surgeon needs to remove more than 2,000 grams (about 4.4 lbs) from each breast.

Q: Are certain surgical techniques safer for obese patients?

A: This study looked at various methods, including inferior pedicles and free nipple grafts. It found that the specific surgical method did not change the complication rate.

References

  • [1] Roehl, Kendall M.D.; et al. “Breast Reduction: Safe in the Morbidly Obese?” Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 122(2):p 370-378, August 2008.
  • [2] Perdikis, Galen M.D.; et al. “Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guideline: Revision: Reduction Mammaplasty.” Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 149(3):p 392e-409e, March 2022.
Breast Reduction, Gigantomastia, Obesity & Heavy Breasts
, , , , , , , , ,
0
Regular Post
Written by revera-admin

Robbins vs. McKissock: Does the Surgical Technique Change Your Result for Breast Reduction?

The Search for the “Perfect” Technique

When you research breast reduction, you will find several different surgical methods. For decades, surgeons have debated which technique is superior.

Two of the most famous methods are the Inferior Pedicle (Robbins technique) and the Vertical Bipedicle (McKissock technique). Many surgeons prefer one over the other. They often believe their chosen method provides better shapes or fewer complications.

But does the specific technique actually change your final look? A study from the Rambam Medical Center in Israel compared these two approaches to find out.

The Study: A Three-Way Evaluation

Researchers compared two groups of patients. One group had the McKissock technique. The other had the Inferior Pedicle technique.

To get the most accurate results, they used three different perspectives:

  1. The Patients: How happy were they with their results?
  2. The Surgeon: How did the doctor rate the aesthetic outcome?
  3. An Objective Observer: How did a neutral third party rate the breasts?

The Findings: A Statistical Draw

The results were clear: Both techniques are excellent.

  • Aesthetics: The researchers found no significant difference in the final aesthetic results. Both groups achieved “good to excellent” outcomes.
  • Safety: The complication rates were nearly identical for both methods.
  • Satisfaction: Patients in both groups reported high levels of satisfaction. Interestingly, the patients’ own evaluations were very similar to the objective observer’s ratings.

Expert Critique: Why Technique Isn’t Everything

In the accompanying discussion, Dr. Robert Ruberg noted that these results are predictable. He explains that if two techniques use the same Wise Pattern (the “Anchor” scar) for the skin, the final look is usually the same.

However, Dr. Ruberg pointed out several “glaring deficiencies” in the study that patients should keep in mind:

  • Different Surgeons: A single senior surgeon performed the McKissock cases. Meanwhile, various residents performed the Inferior Pedicle cases.
  • Different Hospitals: The surgeries took place in very different settings (one private and one public hospital).
  • Patient Motivation: The two groups of patients had different socioeconomic backgrounds and different motivations for seeking surgery.

The Takeaway for You

This research proves that there is no “best” technique for every patient. The skill and experience of your surgeon matter more than the name of the method they use.

As Dr. Ruberg suggests, no study has ever clearly demonstrated that one technique is superior to all others. Instead, multiple techniques are highly effective at relieving your symptoms and improving your health.

Your Next Step:

Do not choose a surgeon based on a specific “named” technique. Instead, choose a board-certified plastic surgeon whose “Before and After” gallery reflects the results you want.

Ask yourself “Who is the Best Plastic Surgeon Near Me?”.
Contact us to know if you are a suitable candidate for Breast Reduction.

Revera Clinic caters with the Best Plastic Surgeon in Hyderabad!

References

Breast Reduction
, , , , , , , , , , ,
0
Regular Post
Written by revera-admin

Hidden Findings: Why We Test Tissue After Breast Reduction

The Routine Lab Test

When you undergo a breast reduction, your surgeon removes excess fat, skin, and glandular tissue. But what happens to that tissue?

Most patients assume it is simply discarded. However, standard safety protocols require this tissue to be sent to a lab for evaluation. While the goal of surgery is relief from physical pain, this routine step can sometimes uncover “occult” (hidden) medical findings.

The Evidence: The ASPS Recommendation

The American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS) provides clear “Gold Standard” guidelines for this procedure.

  • The Rule: Plastic surgeons should send breast tissue from all patients for pathologic evaluation.
  • The Benefit: This allows for the early detection of cancer or high-risk lesions.
  • The Rationale: Preoperative mammograms are helpful but not perfect. They do not always catch the tiny abnormalities found in surgical specimens.

What the Research Says: The Emory University Study

A major study from Emory University analyzed the records of 1,014 patients who had breast reductions over 20 years. The researchers wanted to know how often hidden (occult) cancer or high-risk cells were found.

They split the patients into two groups:

  • Group A: Women with no history of breast cancer.
  • Group B: Women who had a previous breast cancer diagnosis.

The Incidence of Hidden Findings

The study found that these hidden findings are “not uncommon”.

  1. For General Patients (Group A): High-risk or malignant cells were found in 1.8% of patients.
  2. For Cancer Survivors (Group B): The risk was much higher, 8% of these patients had hidden findings in their reduction specimens.

Who Is at Higher Risk?

The research identified two major “positive predictors” for finding hidden abnormalities during surgery:

  • Increasing Age: As patients get older, the likelihood of a positive finding increases.
  • Personal History: Having a previous breast cancer diagnosis is a significant risk factor.

Why This Matters for Your Safety

Finding these cells early is a major benefit. Identifying high-risk lesions allows your medical team to start early treatment or more frequent screening.

As the authors of the study concluded, it is crucial for surgeons to maintain open communication with the lab. This ensures that if something is found, your follow-up care is precise and effective.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Q: If my mammogram was clear, do I still need a lab test?

A: Yes. Research shows that 81% of patients with abnormal findings in their surgery tissue had a “normal” preoperative mammogram. The lab test is a necessary safety net.

Q: Is it common to find cancer during a breast reduction?

A: No, it is rare. In general patients, the risk is about 1.8%. However, “high-risk” cells (which are not cancer but could lead to it) are found slightly more often.

Q: Does insurance cover the cost of the lab test?

A: Generally, because this is a standard-of-care recommendation from the ASPS, it is treated as a necessary part of the medical procedure.

References

  • [1] Razavi, Seyed Amirhossein M.D.; et al. “The Incidence of Occult Malignant and High-Risk Pathologic Findings in Breast Reduction Specimens.” Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 148(4):p 534e-539e, October 2021.
  • [2] Perdikis, Galen M.D.; et al. “Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guideline: Revision: Reduction Mammaplasty.” Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 149(3):p 392e-409e, March 2022.
Breast Reduction
, , , , , , , , , ,
0
Regular Post
Written by revera-admin

Breast Reduction: Surgery vs. No Surgery? A Quality of Life Study

The Decision to Wait

Many women seek a consultation for breast reduction to address the physical and emotional burden of large breasts (macromastia). However, for various reasons, some patients choose not to proceed with the surgery.

Is “waiting and seeing” a viable strategy? Or does the quality of life continue to decline without intervention? Researchers at the University of Pennsylvania aimed to quantify exactly how much the surgery helps compared to those who do not undergo the procedure.

The Study: A Fair Comparison

To ensure an accurate comparison, the researchers used propensity score matching. This means they matched patients in the surgical group with patients in the non-surgical group who had similar ages, body mass index (BMI), and breast measurements.

  • Participants: 100 matched patients were identified.
  • Average Age: 39.5 years.
  • Average BMI: 31.1 $kg/m^2$.
  • Method: Both groups were surveyed using the BREAST-Q, a validated tool that measures patient-reported quality of life.

The Results: A Widening Gap

The data showed a stark difference between those who had the surgery and those who remained in the non-operative group.

1. The Surgery Group (Operative)

For the patients who underwent breast reduction, the researchers observed significant improvements in every single category.

  • Physical Well-being: Patients felt less pain and physical restriction.
  • Psychosocial Well-being: Confidence and social comfort increased.
  • Sexual Well-being: Patients felt more positive about intimacy and their bodies.
  • Satisfaction with Breasts: Satisfaction with their appearance improved drastically.

2. The Non-Surgery Group (Non-operative)

For the women who chose not to have surgery, the results were much different.

  • No Improvement: These patients realized no benefit or improvement in their quality of life over time.
  • Deterioration: Across two of the four domains, their quality of life scores actually showed a downward trend.
  • The Takeaway: Large breasts are a progressive issue. Without surgery, the physical and emotional burden often gets worse rather than better.

Why This Matters for You

This study provides strong evidence that breast reduction is not just a “cosmetic” change. It is a highly effective treatment for a condition that impacts your entire well-being.

As the authors concluded, patients who undergo the surgery see statistically significant improvements in all aspects of life. Meanwhile, those who wait or rely on non-surgical methods realize no benefit with time.

If you are struggling with the symptoms of macromastia, this research confirms that surgery is the definitive path toward a better quality of life.

Reference

Breast Reduction, Gigantomastia
, , , , , , , , ,
0
1 2 3 4