Pain Pump in Breast Reduction Surgery. Shows the schematic with the Infusion Chamber
Regular Post
Written by revera-admin

Less Pain, Faster Home: The Power of “Pain Pumps” in Breast Reduction Surgery

The End of the Hospital “Hangover”

Traditionally, recovering from a breast reduction or reconstruction required a hospital stay. Patients often needed heavy intravenous (IV) narcotics to manage their pain. These medications effectively block pain, but they often cause nausea, grogginess, and constipation.

Researchers at Northwestern Memorial Hospital in Chicago found a better way. By using a continuous “pain pump,” they helped patients go home sooner with significantly less discomfort.

What is a “Pain Pump”?

A pain pump is a small, portable device. It uses a tiny, indwelling catheter to deliver local anesthetic directly to the surgical site. Unlike a one-time injection, the pump provides a continuous infiltration of numbing medication for several days.

The Study: 148 Patients Compared

The study analyzed 74 breast reduction patients and 74 breast reconstruction patients. The researchers compared those who used traditional pain relief to those who used the Pain Pump in Breast Reduction Surgery.

1. Benefits for Pain Pump in Breast Reduction Surgery

The results for breast reduction patients were dramatic.

  • Fewer Hospital Stays: Patients with the pump were significantly less likely to need hospital admission. Many were able to recover comfortably at home.
  • Lower Pain Scores: Patients reported significantly less pain while in the recovery room.
  • Fewer Narcotics: The pump group required much lower amounts of cumulative pain medication.

2. Benefits for Breast Reconstruction

For those undergoing tissue expander reconstruction, the pump also offered clear advantages.

  • Significant Pain Relief: These patients reported much lower average pain scores.
  • Reduced Medication Use: Like the reduction group, these patients used significantly fewer narcotics.
  • Proven Safety: There were zero expander infections related to having the catheter near the implant.

Why This Fits Modern Guidelines

The American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS) now strongly recommends these types of “non-narcotic” strategies. Using local anesthetics like Bupivacaine significantly improves pain scores immediately after surgery. It also helps you get through recovery with fewer side effects.

Medication Overview: What’s in the Pump?

To help you understand your recovery, here is a brief overview of the medications involved in this study.

1. Bupivacaine (Local Anesthetic)

  • Category: Local anesthetic (Amide-type).
  • Mechanism of Action: It blocks sodium channels in the nerve fibers. This stops the nerve from sending pain signals to your brain.
  • Potential Side Effects: While very safe in a pump, potential side effects can include localized numbness or tingling. In very rare cases of accidental systemic absorption, it can affect the heart or central nervous system.

2. Narcotics (Opioids)

  • Category: Opioid analgesics.
  • Mechanism of Action: These bind to specific “opioid receptors” in the brain and spinal cord. They change how your body perceives and responds to pain.
  • Potential Side Effects: Common side effects include nausea, vomiting, dizziness, and constipation. They also carry a risk of respiratory depression and potential dependency with long-term use.

——————————-

Ask yourself “Who is the Best Plastic Surgeon Near Me?”.
Contact us to know if you are a suitable candidate for Breast Reduction.

Revera Clinic caters with the Best Plastic Surgeon in Hyderabad!
Our Anaesthetists are highly accomplished and help in a pain free recovery.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Q: Does the pump hurt to remove?

A: No. The catheter is very thin, similar to a piece of fishing line. Removing it is usually quick and painless, often done by the patient or nurse at home.

Q: Will I still need some narcotic pills?

A: Most patients still have a prescription for “breakthrough” pain. However, as this study shows, you will likely need much fewer than if you didn’t have the pump.

Q: Is it safe for breast implants?

A: Yes. The study specifically noted that there were no infections or issues when the pump was used near tissue expanders.

References

Breast Reduction, Pain Management
, , , , , , , , ,
0
Regular Post
Written by revera-admin

The Vertical “Lollipop” Scar: Now for Large Breasts – Breast Reduction

Can Large Breasts Have Smaller Scars?

In the past, patients with very large breasts (resection weights over 700g) were almost always given an “Anchor” scar. Surgeons believed the Vertical (or “Lollipop“) technique only worked for small reductions. They feared that the vertical scar would not be strong enough to hold the weight of a larger breast over time.

However, a massive study published in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery has changed that thinking.

Researchers analyzed 500 breast reductions in 250 overweight patients. The research was conducted in Ulm, Germany, and Padova, Italy. They used a modified version of the “Lejour Technique” to prove that large breasts can achieve excellent results with fewer scars.

The Modifications: Making the Vertical Technique Stronger

The standard vertical technique can be difficult for large breasts. Therefore, the authors introduced several key modifications to make it more reliable.

1. Central Undermining (No Liposuction)

Instead of using liposuction to reduce volume, the surgeons used a “step-wise” surgical approach. They moved the tissue centrally and atraumatically. This preserves the best possible blood supply to the skin and nipple.

2. The “Three H Points” Fixation

This is the most critical part of the modification. A common problem with vertical reductions is “bottoming out.” This happens when the breast tissue sinks over time, making the bottom of the breast look too heavy.

To prevent this, the surgeons fixed the submammary fold (the crease under the breast) using three H points. These points act as a “pivot.” They anchor the internal tissue so it cannot sag later.

3. Adjusted Pleated Sutures

The vertical scar is often “pleated” or gathered during surgery. The authors adjusted this technique to match the specific retraction ability of the patient’s skin. For very large reductions, they occasionally combined it with a small horizontal line to ensure a smooth finish.

The Results: 94% Success Rate

The study tracked 250 patients for an average of 4.2 years. This long-term follow-up is important to see if the shape holds up.

  • Large Reductions: The average tissue removed was nearly 1,000g per breast (over 2 lbs).
  • Patient Outcomes: 94% of patients rated their results as “Very Good” or “Good”.
  • Safety: The complication rate was 14%, which is comparable to traditional techniques.

Conclusion: A New Standard for Large Breasts

This research proves that the vertical technique is no longer just for “small” cases. It is a highly effective standard technique for larger breasts.

By using the “Three H Points,” surgeons can simplify the technique while reducing the visible scarring. If you have been told you are “too large” for a vertical reduction, this study shows that a modified approach can offer the smaller scar you want with the stability you need.

——————————-

Ask yourself “Who is the Best Plastic Surgeon Near Me?”.
Contact us to know if you are a suitable candidate for Breast Reduction.

Revera Clinic caters with the Best Plastic Surgeon in Hyderabad!

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Q: Does this technique work if I am overweight?

A: Yes. This study specifically looked at overweight patients with an average resection weight of over 900g per breast.

Q: Will the “pleated” scar look bumpy?

A: Initially, the vertical scar may look gathered. However, the study adjusted the sutures to the skin’s natural ability to retract. Over time, these lines typically flatten and fade significantly.

Q: What is the main benefit over the “Anchor” scar?

A: The primary benefit is the reduction of aesthetic deficiencies. You avoid the long horizontal scar across the chest, resulting in a more natural look in clothing and swimwear.

Reference

Hofmann, Albert K. M.D.; et al. “Breast Reduction: Modified ‘Lejour Technique’ in 500 Large Breasts.” Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 120(5):p 1095-1104, October 2007.

Breast Reduction, Gigantomastia
, , , , , , , , , , ,
0
Regular Post
Written by revera-admin

Breast Reduction: Is It Safe if You are Morbidly Obese?

The Weight Barrier

Many plastic surgeons hesitate to perform breast reductions on patients with a high Body Mass Index (BMI). This is especially true for “morbidly obese” patients (BMI of 40 or higher).

Surgeons often worry about a higher risk of infections and poor wound healing. They also fear the challenges of Gigantomastia. This is when a surgeon must remove more than 2,000 grams of tissue from each breast.

But does the data actually support turning these patients away? A study published in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery investigated this exact question.

The Study: Analyzing 179 Patients

Researchers in Galveston, Texas, performed a retrospective review of 179 patients. They wanted to see which factors truly caused complications. They looked at:

  • Body Mass Index (BMI).
  • The weight of the tissue removed.
  • The patient’s age.
  • Smoking status.
  • Other health conditions (comorbidities).

The Findings: Safety Across the Scale

The researchers found an overall complication rate of 50%. While this number seems high, it mostly consisted of minor healing issues common in large-volume surgeries.

Crucially, the study found no statistical difference in complications based on:

  1. BMI: Patients with a BMI over 40 were just as safe as those with lower BMIs.
  2. Reduction Size: Removing massive amounts of tissue (>2000g) did not increase the danger.
  3. Age: Older patients did not face more risks than younger ones in this group.

Furthermore, smoking status and other medical conditions did not significantly impact the complication rates in this study.

The Conclusion: A Green Light for Surgery

The study reached a bold conclusion. It is as safe to perform large-volume breast reductions in morbidly obese patients as it is in anyone else.

What This Means for You

If you have a high BMI and suffer from the weight of very large breasts, you may have been told to “lose weight first.” While losing weight is generally healthy, this research proves that you do not have to wait to find relief from physical pain.

Modern guidelines from the American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS) agree. They recommend that surgery be offered based on your symptoms, not just your weight.

If you suffer from back pain, rashes, or shoulder grooving, you deserve a consultation. A skilled surgeon can perform your reduction safely, regardless of your starting weight.

—————

Ask yourself “Who is the Best Plastic Surgeon Near Me?”.
Contact us to know if you are a suitable candidate for Breast Reduction.

Revera Clinic caters with the Best Plastic Surgeon in Hyderabad!

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Q: Will a high BMI make my recovery longer?

A: Possibly. While major complications are not higher, some studies suggest that patients with a BMI over 35 may take longer than two months to heal completely.

Q: What is “Gigantomastia”?

A: This is a medical term for extremely large breasts. It usually applies when a surgeon needs to remove more than 2,000 grams (about 4.4 lbs) from each breast.

Q: Are certain surgical techniques safer for obese patients?

A: This study looked at various methods, including inferior pedicles and free nipple grafts. It found that the specific surgical method did not change the complication rate.

References

  • [1] Roehl, Kendall M.D.; et al. “Breast Reduction: Safe in the Morbidly Obese?” Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 122(2):p 370-378, August 2008.
  • [2] Perdikis, Galen M.D.; et al. “Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guideline: Revision: Reduction Mammaplasty.” Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 149(3):p 392e-409e, March 2022.
Breast Reduction, Gigantomastia, Obesity & Heavy Breasts
, , , , , , , , ,
0
Regular Post
Written by revera-admin

Robbins vs. McKissock: Does the Surgical Technique Change Your Result for Breast Reduction?

The Search for the “Perfect” Technique

When you research breast reduction, you will find several different surgical methods. For decades, surgeons have debated which technique is superior.

Two of the most famous methods are the Inferior Pedicle (Robbins technique) and the Vertical Bipedicle (McKissock technique). Many surgeons prefer one over the other. They often believe their chosen method provides better shapes or fewer complications.

But does the specific technique actually change your final look? A study from the Rambam Medical Center in Israel compared these two approaches to find out.

The Study: A Three-Way Evaluation

Researchers compared two groups of patients. One group had the McKissock technique. The other had the Inferior Pedicle technique.

To get the most accurate results, they used three different perspectives:

  1. The Patients: How happy were they with their results?
  2. The Surgeon: How did the doctor rate the aesthetic outcome?
  3. An Objective Observer: How did a neutral third party rate the breasts?

The Findings: A Statistical Draw

The results were clear: Both techniques are excellent.

  • Aesthetics: The researchers found no significant difference in the final aesthetic results. Both groups achieved “good to excellent” outcomes.
  • Safety: The complication rates were nearly identical for both methods.
  • Satisfaction: Patients in both groups reported high levels of satisfaction. Interestingly, the patients’ own evaluations were very similar to the objective observer’s ratings.

Expert Critique: Why Technique Isn’t Everything

In the accompanying discussion, Dr. Robert Ruberg noted that these results are predictable. He explains that if two techniques use the same Wise Pattern (the “Anchor” scar) for the skin, the final look is usually the same.

However, Dr. Ruberg pointed out several “glaring deficiencies” in the study that patients should keep in mind:

  • Different Surgeons: A single senior surgeon performed the McKissock cases. Meanwhile, various residents performed the Inferior Pedicle cases.
  • Different Hospitals: The surgeries took place in very different settings (one private and one public hospital).
  • Patient Motivation: The two groups of patients had different socioeconomic backgrounds and different motivations for seeking surgery.

The Takeaway for You

This research proves that there is no “best” technique for every patient. The skill and experience of your surgeon matter more than the name of the method they use.

As Dr. Ruberg suggests, no study has ever clearly demonstrated that one technique is superior to all others. Instead, multiple techniques are highly effective at relieving your symptoms and improving your health.

Your Next Step:

Do not choose a surgeon based on a specific “named” technique. Instead, choose a board-certified plastic surgeon whose “Before and After” gallery reflects the results you want.

Ask yourself “Who is the Best Plastic Surgeon Near Me?”.
Contact us to know if you are a suitable candidate for Breast Reduction.

Revera Clinic caters with the Best Plastic Surgeon in Hyderabad!

References

Breast Reduction
, , , , , , , , , , ,
0
Regular Post
Written by revera-admin

Hidden Findings: Why We Test Tissue After Breast Reduction

The Routine Lab Test

When you undergo a breast reduction, your surgeon removes excess fat, skin, and glandular tissue. But what happens to that tissue?

Most patients assume it is simply discarded. However, standard safety protocols require this tissue to be sent to a lab for evaluation. While the goal of surgery is relief from physical pain, this routine step can sometimes uncover “occult” (hidden) medical findings.

The Evidence: The ASPS Recommendation

The American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS) provides clear “Gold Standard” guidelines for this procedure.

  • The Rule: Plastic surgeons should send breast tissue from all patients for pathologic evaluation.
  • The Benefit: This allows for the early detection of cancer or high-risk lesions.
  • The Rationale: Preoperative mammograms are helpful but not perfect. They do not always catch the tiny abnormalities found in surgical specimens.

What the Research Says: The Emory University Study

A major study from Emory University analyzed the records of 1,014 patients who had breast reductions over 20 years. The researchers wanted to know how often hidden (occult) cancer or high-risk cells were found.

They split the patients into two groups:

  • Group A: Women with no history of breast cancer.
  • Group B: Women who had a previous breast cancer diagnosis.

The Incidence of Hidden Findings

The study found that these hidden findings are “not uncommon”.

  1. For General Patients (Group A): High-risk or malignant cells were found in 1.8% of patients.
  2. For Cancer Survivors (Group B): The risk was much higher, 8% of these patients had hidden findings in their reduction specimens.

Who Is at Higher Risk?

The research identified two major “positive predictors” for finding hidden abnormalities during surgery:

  • Increasing Age: As patients get older, the likelihood of a positive finding increases.
  • Personal History: Having a previous breast cancer diagnosis is a significant risk factor.

Why This Matters for Your Safety

Finding these cells early is a major benefit. Identifying high-risk lesions allows your medical team to start early treatment or more frequent screening.

As the authors of the study concluded, it is crucial for surgeons to maintain open communication with the lab. This ensures that if something is found, your follow-up care is precise and effective.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Q: If my mammogram was clear, do I still need a lab test?

A: Yes. Research shows that 81% of patients with abnormal findings in their surgery tissue had a “normal” preoperative mammogram. The lab test is a necessary safety net.

Q: Is it common to find cancer during a breast reduction?

A: No, it is rare. In general patients, the risk is about 1.8%. However, “high-risk” cells (which are not cancer but could lead to it) are found slightly more often.

Q: Does insurance cover the cost of the lab test?

A: Generally, because this is a standard-of-care recommendation from the ASPS, it is treated as a necessary part of the medical procedure.

References

  • [1] Razavi, Seyed Amirhossein M.D.; et al. “The Incidence of Occult Malignant and High-Risk Pathologic Findings in Breast Reduction Specimens.” Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 148(4):p 534e-539e, October 2021.
  • [2] Perdikis, Galen M.D.; et al. “Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guideline: Revision: Reduction Mammaplasty.” Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 149(3):p 392e-409e, March 2022.
Breast Reduction
, , , , , , , , , ,
0
Regular Post
Written by revera-admin

Breast Reduction: Surgery vs. No Surgery? A Quality of Life Study

The Decision to Wait

Many women seek a consultation for breast reduction to address the physical and emotional burden of large breasts (macromastia). However, for various reasons, some patients choose not to proceed with the surgery.

Is “waiting and seeing” a viable strategy? Or does the quality of life continue to decline without intervention? Researchers at the University of Pennsylvania aimed to quantify exactly how much the surgery helps compared to those who do not undergo the procedure.

The Study: A Fair Comparison

To ensure an accurate comparison, the researchers used propensity score matching. This means they matched patients in the surgical group with patients in the non-surgical group who had similar ages, body mass index (BMI), and breast measurements.

  • Participants: 100 matched patients were identified.
  • Average Age: 39.5 years.
  • Average BMI: 31.1 $kg/m^2$.
  • Method: Both groups were surveyed using the BREAST-Q, a validated tool that measures patient-reported quality of life.

The Results: A Widening Gap

The data showed a stark difference between those who had the surgery and those who remained in the non-operative group.

1. The Surgery Group (Operative)

For the patients who underwent breast reduction, the researchers observed significant improvements in every single category.

  • Physical Well-being: Patients felt less pain and physical restriction.
  • Psychosocial Well-being: Confidence and social comfort increased.
  • Sexual Well-being: Patients felt more positive about intimacy and their bodies.
  • Satisfaction with Breasts: Satisfaction with their appearance improved drastically.

2. The Non-Surgery Group (Non-operative)

For the women who chose not to have surgery, the results were much different.

  • No Improvement: These patients realized no benefit or improvement in their quality of life over time.
  • Deterioration: Across two of the four domains, their quality of life scores actually showed a downward trend.
  • The Takeaway: Large breasts are a progressive issue. Without surgery, the physical and emotional burden often gets worse rather than better.

Why This Matters for You

This study provides strong evidence that breast reduction is not just a “cosmetic” change. It is a highly effective treatment for a condition that impacts your entire well-being.

As the authors concluded, patients who undergo the surgery see statistically significant improvements in all aspects of life. Meanwhile, those who wait or rely on non-surgical methods realize no benefit with time.

If you are struggling with the symptoms of macromastia, this research confirms that surgery is the definitive path toward a better quality of life.

Reference

Breast Reduction, Gigantomastia
, , , , , , , , ,
0
Regular Post
Written by revera-admin

The Hall-Findlay Technique: Simplifying the “Lollipop” Breast Reduction

Why Vertical Breast Reduction Used to Be Hard

For many years, the Vertical Reduction Mammaplasty (often called the “Lollipop” reduction) struggled to gain popularity in North America. Surgeons worried that the technique was too difficult to learn. Many also believed it only worked for small breast reductions.

Dr. Elizabeth Hall-Findlay changed this perspective. In her influential study published in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, she introduced modifications that made the procedure simpler, safer, and more reliable for all sizes.

Four Key Modifications That Simplified Everything

Dr. Hall-Findlay identified several steps in the traditional “Lejour” technique that made it complicated. She simplified the surgery by focusing on these four changes:

1. The Medial (or Lateral) Pedicle

Instead of using a complex central blood supply, she used a medial or lateral dermoglandular pedicle. This tissue bridge safely carries the blood supply to the nipple. This change makes the move (transposition) of the nipple much more predictable for the surgeon.

2. No Skin Undermining

Traditional methods often involved “undermining” or separating the skin from the underlying breast tissue. Dr. Hall-Findlay removed this step. By keeping the skin attached, the breast retains better blood flow and heals more reliably.

3. Minimal Use of Liposuction

While some techniques rely heavily on liposuction to reduce breast volume, Dr. Hall-Findlay found it was rarely necessary. She preferred direct surgical removal to ensure a more precise and stable breast shape.

4. No Pectoralis Fascia Sutures

She eliminated the need to stitch the breast tissue to the chest muscle (pectoralis fascia). This streamlined the operation and reduced internal complexity.

Proven Results: 400 Successful Cases

Dr. Hall-Findlay tested these modifications in a series of 400 vertical breast reductions. The results proved that the “Lollipop” method isn’t just for small breasts.

  • Broad Application: The average reduction was 525g per breast, but she successfully removed up to 1425g using this technique.
  • Reduced Scarring: By using a vertical pattern, she effectively eliminated the long horizontal scar found in traditional “Anchor” reductions.
  • Ease of Use: The study concluded that these modifications made the technique much easier for other surgeons to learn and apply.

The Takeaway for Patients

If you want a breast reduction with less scarring, you no longer have to worry if your breasts are “too large” for a vertical technique. Thanks to these refinements, surgeons can offer the “Lollipop” reduction with high safety and excellent, long-lasting results.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: Is the vertical technique safe for very large breasts?

A: Yes. Dr. Hall-Findlay’s research showed it is effective for reductions involving over 1400g of tissue per breast.

Q: What is the main benefit of the medial pedicle?

A: It provides a very reliable blood supply to the nipple and areola, which reduces the risk of healing complications.

Q: Will the “Lollipop” shape hold up over time?

A: Because this technique uses internal tissue shaping rather than just skin tightening, the results tend to be very stable.

Reference

[1] Hall-Findlay, Elizabeth J. M.D., F.R.C.S.(C). “A Simplified Vertical Reduction Mammaplasty: Shortening the Learning Curve.” Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 104(3):p 748-759, September 1999.

Breast Reduction, Gigantomastia
, , , , , , , , ,
0
Regular Post
Written by revera-admin

Can a “Heavy Chest” Actually Hurt Your Lungs?

The Weight on Your Chest

Women with macromastia (excessively large breasts) often complain of a “heavy” feeling on their chest. They may feel short of breath during exercise or even while resting.

Is this just a sensation? Or does the weight of the breasts actually restrict the lungs from filling with air?

A Randomized Controlled Trial from the University of Hull in the United Kingdom sought to answer this medical question.

The Study: Testing Lung Capacity

The researchers wanted to see if removing the breast weight improved lung function physically. They conducted a high-quality study (Randomized Controlled Trial) with 73 women.

  • Group 1 (Surgery): These women had breast reduction surgery immediately (within 6 weeks).
  • Group 2 (Control): These women waited 6 months before having surgery.

The doctors used spirometry (lung function tests) to measure how much air the women could inhale and exhale. They compared the results between the two groups.

The Findings: Weight Matters

The results revealed an interesting connection between breast size and breathing.

When they looked at the groups as a whole, the difference wasn’t immediately obvious. However, when they looked closer at the surgery group, they found a clear pattern.

  • The Correlation: There was a positive correlation between the weight of the tissue removed and the improvement in lung function.
  • The Takeaway: The more weight the surgeon removed, the better the patient’s lung test scores (like Peak Expiratory Flow) became.
  • Significant Improvement: Specifically, the study showed a significant improvement in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC). This measures the total amount of air you can forcibly exhale from your lungs.

Why Does This Happen?

Large breasts can act like a physical weight on the chest wall. This external weight may prevent the ribcage from expanding fully when you take a deep breath.

By performing a reduction mammaplasty, the surgeon removes this restriction. This allows the chest wall to move more freely, helping the lungs expand to their full predicted capacity.

Conclusion

If you have massive breasts and struggle to catch your breath, it might not just be “in your head.” It could be a mechanical restriction.

This study confirms that for women with heavy breasts, reduction surgery does more than relieve back pain. It correlates with a measurable improvement in pulmonary (lung) function.

Reference

[1] Iwuagwu, Obi C. F.R.C.S.; et al. “Does Reduction Mammaplasty Improve Lung Function Test in Women with Macromastia? Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial.” Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 118(1):p 1-6, July 2006.

Breast Reduction
, , , , , , , , ,
0