Best Plastic Surgeon in Hyderabad Archives

Can Large Breasts Have Smaller Scars?

In the past, patients with very large breasts (resection weights over 700g) were almost always given an “Anchor” scar. Surgeons believed the Vertical (or “Lollipop“) technique only worked for small reductions. They feared that the vertical scar would not be strong enough to hold the weight of a larger breast over time.

However, a massive study published in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery has changed that thinking.

Researchers analyzed 500 breast reductions in 250 overweight patients. The research was conducted in Ulm, Germany, and Padova, Italy. They used a modified version of the “Lejour Technique” to prove that large breasts can achieve excellent results with fewer scars.

The Modifications: Making the Vertical Technique Stronger

The standard vertical technique can be difficult for large breasts. Therefore, the authors introduced several key modifications to make it more reliable.

1. Central Undermining (No Liposuction)

Instead of using liposuction to reduce volume, the surgeons used a “step-wise” surgical approach. They moved the tissue centrally and atraumatically. This preserves the best possible blood supply to the skin and nipple.

2. The “Three H Points” Fixation

This is the most critical part of the modification. A common problem with vertical reductions is “bottoming out.” This happens when the breast tissue sinks over time, making the bottom of the breast look too heavy.

To prevent this, the surgeons fixed the submammary fold (the crease under the breast) using three H points. These points act as a “pivot.” They anchor the internal tissue so it cannot sag later.

3. Adjusted Pleated Sutures

The vertical scar is often “pleated” or gathered during surgery. The authors adjusted this technique to match the specific retraction ability of the patient’s skin. For very large reductions, they occasionally combined it with a small horizontal line to ensure a smooth finish.

The Results: 94% Success Rate

The study tracked 250 patients for an average of 4.2 years. This long-term follow-up is important to see if the shape holds up.

Large Reductions: The average tissue removed was nearly 1,000g per breast (over 2 lbs).
Patient Outcomes: 94% of patients rated their results as “Very Good” or “Good”.
Safety: The complication rate was 14%, which is comparable to traditional techniques.

Conclusion: A New Standard for Large Breasts

This research proves that the vertical technique is no longer just for “small” cases. It is a highly effective standard technique for larger breasts.

By using the “Three H Points,” surgeons can simplify the technique while reducing the visible scarring. If you have been told you are “too large” for a vertical reduction, this study shows that a modified approach can offer the smaller scar you want with the stability you need.

——————————-

Ask yourself “Who is the Best Plastic Surgeon Near Me?”.
Contact us to know if you are a suitable candidate for Breast Reduction.

Revera Clinic caters with the Best Plastic Surgeon in Hyderabad!

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Q: Does this technique work if I am overweight?

A: Yes. This study specifically looked at overweight patients with an average resection weight of over 900g per breast.

Q: Will the “pleated” scar look bumpy?

A: Initially, the vertical scar may look gathered. However, the study adjusted the sutures to the skin’s natural ability to retract. Over time, these lines typically flatten and fade significantly.

Q: What is the main benefit over the “Anchor” scar?

A: The primary benefit is the reduction of aesthetic deficiencies. You avoid the long horizontal scar across the chest, resulting in a more natural look in clothing and swimwear.

Reference

Hofmann, Albert K. M.D.; et al. “Breast Reduction: Modified ‘Lejour Technique’ in 500 Large Breasts.” Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 120(5):p 1095-1104, October 2007.

The Search for the “Perfect” Technique

When you research breast reduction, you will find several different surgical methods. For decades, surgeons have debated which technique is superior.

Two of the most famous methods are the Inferior Pedicle (Robbins technique) and the Vertical Bipedicle (McKissock technique). Many surgeons prefer one over the other. They often believe their chosen method provides better shapes or fewer complications.

But does the specific technique actually change your final look? A study from the Rambam Medical Center in Israel compared these two approaches to find out.

The Study: A Three-Way Evaluation

Researchers compared two groups of patients. One group had the McKissock technique. The other had the Inferior Pedicle technique.

To get the most accurate results, they used three different perspectives:

The Patients: How happy were they with their results?
The Surgeon: How did the doctor rate the aesthetic outcome?
An Objective Observer: How did a neutral third party rate the breasts?

The Findings: A Statistical Draw

The results were clear: Both techniques are excellent.

Aesthetics: The researchers found no significant difference in the final aesthetic results. Both groups achieved “good to excellent” outcomes.
Safety: The complication rates were nearly identical for both methods.
Satisfaction: Patients in both groups reported high levels of satisfaction. Interestingly, the patients’ own evaluations were very similar to the objective observer’s ratings.

Expert Critique: Why Technique Isn’t Everything

In the accompanying discussion, Dr. Robert Ruberg noted that these results are predictable. He explains that if two techniques use the same Wise Pattern (the “Anchor” scar) for the skin, the final look is usually the same.

However, Dr. Ruberg pointed out several “glaring deficiencies” in the study that patients should keep in mind:

Different Surgeons: A single senior surgeon performed the McKissock cases. Meanwhile, various residents performed the Inferior Pedicle cases.
Different Hospitals: The surgeries took place in very different settings (one private and one public hospital).
Patient Motivation: The two groups of patients had different socioeconomic backgrounds and different motivations for seeking surgery.

The Takeaway for You

This research proves that there is no “best” technique for every patient. The skill and experience of your surgeon matter more than the name of the method they use.

As Dr. Ruberg suggests, no study has ever clearly demonstrated that one technique is superior to all others. Instead, multiple techniques are highly effective at relieving your symptoms and improving your health.

Your Next Step:

Do not choose a surgeon based on a specific “named” technique. Instead, choose a board-certified plastic surgeon whose “Before and After” gallery reflects the results you want.